Just come across this... made me giggle.
There is a very large chance that if you only know a little about the Internet that you won't find this at all amusing...
As for when bloged.co.uk is going IPv6, well in theory it could do it now (seeing as I've got myself some IPv6 addresses [all 2^64 of them!]) however, as this traffic is routed via New York I'm currently looking at a different place to get them (as in from my ISP...).
How come you're routing your IPv6 via New York Ed?!
I'm using 6to4 via "nearest" anycast (192.88.99.1) and it maps out to Germany (titan-networks.de).
Are you using a different tunneling method or does New York appear closer to you?
Posted by: Steve on November 1, 2007 8:30 PMAh, I'm doing a different tunneling method, connecting via freenet at the moment.
I'll look into setting up 6to4. Although, I might end up opting to get a tunnel directly to Enta, so the end of tunnel is right at the other end of my ADSL... if they support Hexago's migration broker that is... which I've got to find out!
Posted by: Ed on November 1, 2007 8:43 PM6to4 is very slick if you have a capable router. The machine doing 6to4 should have an internet-facing real IPv4 address, so in practice it should be the machine performing NAT for your network.
Here's how to configure it for Linux:
http://tldp.org/HOWTO/Linux+IPv6-HOWTO/configuring-ipv6to4-tunnels.html
Remember to add ip6tables rules, as iptables doesn't cover it...
Posted by: Steve on November 2, 2007 10:58 AM